Which AI Chatbot Nailed the Job Interview

With headlines full of news about corporate layoffs happening at the same time as massive investments in AI, a critical question arises: could an AI actually perform one of these skilled jobs? We decided to find out by putting three of the top AI chatbots—ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude—through a rigorous job interview for a senior Program Manager role.

Each AI candidate was tasked with writing a cover letter and answering a series of challenging interview questions. Only the winning response for each round is highlighted here. Let's see who got the job.

Round 1 The Cover Letter Challenge

The first task was to draft a compelling cover letter for a Program Manager position requiring over 10 years of experience, technical skills, and a customer-oriented approach. While ChatGPT was fluid and Claude included strong quantifiable achievements, Gemini took the win.

Winner: Gemini

Gemini won this round because it demonstrated the most strategic approach. It expertly structured its cover letter to mirror the job description point-for-point, using the same language and sections. This tactic is highly effective for passing through Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) and impressing human hiring managers with a clear, direct match of skills and experience.

Round 2 Handling Complex Projects

The candidates were asked to describe a time they managed a complex project from start to finish and explain how they kept it on track.

Winner: Claude

While ChatGPT was efficient and Gemini provided strong quantifiable results, Claude's response stood out. It organized its answer around four sophisticated pillars: foundation building, stakeholder alignment, risk management, and communication. This demonstrated the strategic thinking and methodological rigor expected from a candidate with a decade of experience.

Round 3 Managing Difficult Stakeholders

Next, the AIs had to explain how they handle difficult clients or stakeholders, particularly at the executive level.

Winner: Claude

Claude won this round by a mile. It showed deep emotional intelligence and executive presence by immediately identifying the core reason for executive-level friction: "they're rarely difficult for the sake of it—they're usually under tremendous pressure." This nuanced understanding of executive psychology is precisely what's needed when interfacing with VP and Director-level stakeholders.

Round 4 Balancing Delivery and Upselling

The candidates were questioned on how they balance delivering current project goals while also identifying opportunities to upsell or cross-sell.

Winner: Claude

Once again, Claude exhibited the business acumen and commercial mindset that separates a senior program manager from a junior one. Its answer demonstrated a sophisticated and patient approach, proving it could handle both project delivery and business growth seamlessly.

Round 5 Prioritizing Competing Projects

The prompt asked how the candidates would prioritize and manage their time when multiple projects were competing for their attention.

Winner: Gemini

Gemini secured a win here by presenting the best-balanced response. It demonstrated a solid, structured process that included the use of an Impact/Urgency matrix. This was more effective than Claude's overly verbose answer and ChatGPT's simplistic approach.

Round 6 Collaborating with Data Teams

In this round, the AIs described their approach to working with data teams on projects related to Data Governance or Data Engineering.

Winner: Gemini

Gemini delivered a standout answer that demonstrated executive-level strategic thinking with perfect clarity. It used language that would resonate with both technical and non-technical stakeholders, a critical skill in a management role.

Round 7 What Defines a Great Program Manager

The final question asked what distinguishes a good Program Manager from a great one.

Winner: Claude

Claude took the final round with an answer that combined strategic insight with evidence-based results. It provided a deep, seven-point framework that went beyond surface-level clichés, truly capturing the essence of what elevates a Program Manager to greatness.

The Final Verdict And the New Hire Is...

After seven intense rounds of questioning, Claude emerged as the strongest candidate and was officially hired.

Claude consistently blended strategic depth, emotional intelligence, and business acumen in a way that most closely matched the real-world expectations for a senior Program Manager. Gemini was an impressive runner-up with its precision and structure, while ChatGPT, though articulate, frequently fell short on strategic depth.

This experiment shows that AI can already mimic middle-management logic with surprising accuracy. However, true leadership still requires a distinctly human mix of judgment, depth, and empathy.

More From Our Team

• I pitted Wikipedia against Elon Musk’s new Grokipedia — here’s which one gave the better answers
• I wore Friend, the AI companion that listens all day — here’s what surprised me most
• How to vibe code with Gemini: 17 creative builds Google just revealed