Back to all posts

Harvard AI Links Photo Age To Cancer Survival Odds

2025-05-27Jason Nelson3 minutes read
Artificial Intelligence
Medical Technology
Cancer Research

Harvard University researchers have unveiled FaceAge, a groundbreaking AI tool designed to estimate biological age through facial analysis. After being trained on nearly 59,000 images of healthy individuals, FaceAge was subsequently applied to cancer patients. The compelling findings revealed a significant link: patients who appeared older than their actual chronological age experienced worse survival outcomes.

How FaceAge Connects Apparent Age with Cancer Survival

A new artificial intelligence model developed at Harvard University, called FaceAge, estimates biological age by analyzing facial features in photos—and might help predict cancer survival by indicating how old a patient appears relative to their actual age.

The FaceAge model was initially trained using a substantial dataset of 58,851 images of healthy individuals. Following this training phase, researchers applied FaceAge to cancer patients to investigate if looking older than one's actual age correlated with more adverse health outcomes.

“We found that, on average, cancer patients look older than their chronological age, and looking older is correlated with worse overall survival,” the report stated. “FaceAge demonstrated significant independent prognostic performance in a range of cancer types and stages.”

It is important to distinguish between chronological age, which is simply the number of years a person has lived, and biological age, which indicates how well—or poorly—their body is functioning relative to that number. According to Harvard researchers, a person’s physical appearance may provide effective biomarkers to determine their biological age.

The Science and Data Powering FaceAge

FaceAge builds on earlier work from ETH Zurich, where researchers created Deep EXpectations (DEX), an open-source deep learning model that estimates apparent age from facial images. The Harvard team also trained FaceAge using images from IMDB-WIKI and UTKFace, two of the largest publicly available facial image datasets.

Harvard's Broader Initiatives in AI Longevity and Cancer Research

Since 2006, Harvard has committed significant resources to understanding and reversing biological aging. More recently, the university has expanded its investment in AI-driven research focused on diagnosing and treating cancer, fields that are increasingly converging.

In October 2024, developers at Harvard Medical School unveiled a new AI model, known as the Clinical Histopathology Imaging Evaluation Foundation (CHIEF). At the time, researchers noted that the AI outperformed previously tested models with a 96% accuracy in cancer detection.

Future Horizons FaceAges Potential Beyond Cancer

While the FaceAge research centered on biological age and cancer, researchers said it could lead to broader applications.

“These findings may extend to diseases beyond cancer, motivating using deep learning algorithms to translate a patient’s visual appearance into objective, quantitative, and clinically useful measures,” the Harvard researchers said.

FaceAge is the latest tool in a growing movement among medical experts to focus on biological age, using facial analysis to identify early signs of decline and shift care toward prevention, rather than just treatment.

Expert Perspective Why AI Excels in Analyzing Biological Age

According to experts like Kian Katanforoosh, adjunct professor of deep learning at Stanford University and founder of the skills intelligence company Workera, the shift towards AI in biological age research is about overcoming human limitations.

“AI analyzes thousands of features in a face for things most of us don’t consciously notice, and finds patterns that correlate with biological aging,” Katanforoosh told Decrypt. “It’s similar to how early deep learning models got better than humans at detecting cats in photos. They didn’t use intuition. They were trained on millions of examples and learned what was statistically consistent.”

“Humans are biased and inconsistent," he added. "AI is trained systematically at a scale we can’t match."

Read Original Post
ImaginePro newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Subscribe to our newsletter to get the latest news and designs.