Back to all posts

Analyzing The Controversial Portland ICE Supporter Photo

2025-10-12Uliana Malashenko3 minutes read
AI Detection
Fact Check
Misinformation

A recent social media post has ignited a debate about digital authenticity. Did the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency share an AI-generated image on its X account to showcase public support amidst protests in Portland, Oregon?

An investigation is underway to determine the photo's origin, but ICE has not yet released the original, unedited image file for analysis. Access to the original would allow for a thorough examination without the privacy blur that ICE added over the individual's face.

The Controversial Post

On October 9, 2025, the official ICE account on X published a post, which you can see archived here, with the caption:

PORTLAND -- Not all outside of our ICE facility are violent. Thank you!

The accompanying image shows a person holding a sign that reads, "I REALLY APPRECIATE YOU GUYS!"

An image posted by ICE showing a person holding a sign in their support. Image source: Lead Stories screenshot of image at x.com/ICEgov.

Visual Analysis Under Scrutiny

Almost immediately, social media users began questioning the image's legitimacy. One user pointed out common AI-generation flaws, such as a "Missing an arm, the sign, no shadows...." (archived here).

A closer look provides some counterarguments:

  • The Arm: The person's left arm is not missing. It appears to be held back and down, causing their hoody to slip off the shoulder. A high-resolution original could confirm if this is a natural pose or an AI artifact.
  • The Sign: The text on the sign is clearly legible, which is often a challenge for generative AI that can produce jumbled or nonsensical letter-like shapes.
  • The Hand: The thumb holding the sign is noticeably lighter in color than the rest of the visible hand. This could be due to AI rendering errors, but it could also be explained by poor circulation, a skin variation, or a contrast against a tattoo or shirt cuff.
  • Shadows: The scene is dimly lit, which is consistent with historical weather data for Portland from October 4-10, 2025, a period that was mostly overcast. The faint shadows visible appear consistent with the lighting conditions. The original file's metadata would be crucial for a more definitive analysis.

Do AI Detectors Have an Answer

When the image was processed through several online AI detection tools, the results were inconclusive. While some tools found slight indications of generative AI, the evidence was not strong enough to definitively label the image as a fake.

Screenshot of an AI detection tool analyzing the image. Image source: Lead Stories screenshot of AI or Not

Geolocation Confirms The Background

One of the most compelling pieces of evidence for the image's authenticity is its background. The location has been precisely matched to a real place in Portland, viewable on Google Maps Street View right here.

A side-by-side comparison of the ICE image background and a Google Maps Street View image. Image source: Lead Stories screenshot of Google Maps

The building's construction details, down to the framing at the base of the wall, are a perfect match.

The Search for Corroborating Evidence

Further investigation, including reverse image searches and manual browsing of news reports about Portland ICE protests, has failed to turn up any other photos of this specific person or scene from another source.

To find a definitive answer, investigators have reached out to ICE for the original, unedited image and have also contacted the occupants of the building shown in the photo. Until more information becomes available, the question of whether the image is real or an AI creation remains unanswered.

Read Original Post
ImaginePro newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Subscribe to our newsletter to get the latest news and designs.